this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
62 points (91.9% liked)

Steam Hardware

20330 readers
73 users here now

A place to discuss and support all Steam Hardware, including Steam Deck, Steam Machine, Steam Frame, and SteamOS in general.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Deck] - Steam Deck related.
[Machine] - Steam Machine related.
[Frame] - Steam Frame related.
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

If your post is only relevant to one hardware device (Deck/Machine/Frame/etc) please specify which one as part of the title or by using a device flair.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

im confused, its specs are amazing and on paper is more powerful than the meta quest 3, but its mainly being advertised as a streaming headset that goes from your vr spec pc (that is becoming more and more expensive these days for people).

so can it play games natively on the headset or not? i want to get it for my birthday as i see it as a worthy sucessor to my quest 2 that is amazing, but its controllers are drifiting to an unrepairable degree.

imagine no mans sky on it :0

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Very likely! Honestly, if the price is able to be as good as the Deck and not the Index, I can see a lot of people adopting VR.

[–] helimopp@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

teh quest 2 sold 20 mill units (most of the 20 12 year olds yes) but still! maybe the frame can sell 25 mil

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 17 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The Quest also has the caveat of being tied to Meta, and people like me will never buy one because of that.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And that caveat also comes with a discount, I heard Quest sells for less than it costs to produce.

I never wanted to get Quest even if the price was good, I hope I will be able to get the Frame soon 🥲

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 2 points 3 days ago

It's not truly a discount either, it's a subsidy. That cost is recouped by the aggregation and sale of your data, which is far more valuable to Meta than a single product sale.

[–] helimopp@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

yeah and that pisses me off. well not the people not buying the hardware but the developers. i would LOVE to play Hotdogs And handgrenades but untill i get the frame i cant as the devs of that game has clearly said "we will not be porting our game to any meta owned platform".

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It shouldn't piss you off. You should be cheering for that behavior, and it would be wonderful if every dev was that brave.

The reason the Quest is relatively affordable is because you are the product. Meta is harvesting your data for free, and the cost is partially subsidized by the sale of your data. Continuing to support the Metas, the Googles, the Xitters, etc. does not ultimately benefit anyone but the wealthy.

I get that it can be frustrating to lose out on some fun, but I think not buying their products is a worthy sacrifice to make for the good of us all.