this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2026
189 points (97.5% liked)

Atheist Memes

7026 readers
289 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

!exchristian@lemmy.one

!exmormon@lemmy.world

!exmuslim@lemmy.world

Other Similar Communities

!religiouscringe@midwest.social

!priest_arrested@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.ml

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I used to have a friend who was extremely skilled at this technique. He would put together an argument so nonsensical that despite being obviously false, nobody could possibly even begin to know how to start refuting any of it. If you challenged one point, he would use three other false yet logical statements to defend it.

[–] EmpatheticTeddyBear@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's when I would interrupt the person with, "stop, you've made your claims, now it is my turn to talk and address each point you made." And if they refuse to stop, I go with this: "Since you refuse to let me speak, this conversation is over." And I walk away.

They also don't like it when I start taking notes on their key points and start calling them out on contradictions.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But if you walk away, you lose.

[–] EmpatheticTeddyBear@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No. Having a debate requires both parties to actually listen to each other's arguments/talking points. When one party refuses to listen, it is no longer a debate. By constantly interrupting, they demonstrate they were never there to have a debate/conversation, but were only there to preach.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Oh no, it was never a debate. It was a game, and he only did it to shut people up.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

This tactic is known as a Gish Gallop

[–] Sibshops@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 1 month ago

I can't even imagine how this kind of conversation would go in real life.