linuxmemes

Frankly, the right answer is that pretty much any non-specialized distribution (e.g. don't use OpenWRT, a Linux distribution designed specifically for very small embedded devices) will probably work fine. That doesn't mean that they all work the same way, but a lot of the differences are around things that honestly aren't that big a deal for most potential end users. Basically, nobody has used more than at most a couple of the distros out there sufficiently to really come up to speed on their differences anyway. Most end users can adapt to a given packaging system, don't care about the init system, are aren't radically affected by mutability/immutability, can get by with different update schedules, etc. In general, people tend to just recommend what they themselves use. The major Linux software packages out there are packaged for the major distros.

I linked to a timeline of Linux distros in this thread. My own recommendation is to use an established distro, one that has been around for some years (which, statistically, indicates that it's got staying power; there are some flash-in-the-pan projects where people discover that doing a Linux distro is larger than they want).

I use Debian, myself. I could give a long list of justifications why, but honestly, it's probably not worth your time. There are people who perfectly happily use Fedora or Ubuntu or Arch or Gentoo or Mint or whatever. A lot of the differences that most end users are going to see comes down to defaults

like, there are people in this thread fighting over distro because of their preferred desktop environment. Like, Debian can run KDE or GNOME or Cinnamon or XFCE or whatever, provides options as to default in the installer, and any of them (or multiple of them) can be added post-initial-installation. You wouldn't say that a car is good or bad based on the setting of the thermostat as it comes from the dealer, like.