this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2025
163 points (100.0% liked)

World News

1088 readers
862 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person, don't post hate.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 2 days ago (4 children)

A distress signal followed on December 23. Spanish rescue units responded and found the ship heavily tilted. The captain claimed mechanical failure, but hull damage showed signs of an external strike consistent with a supercavitating torpedo.

Spy shit? War shit? Both shit?

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 12 points 2 days ago

As far as I'm concerned for Russia: "Eat shit."

Don't care who did it or why, other than to give them a round of applause and buy them a beer.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Leaving North Koreans without electricity isn't good shit actually, US + EU sanctions kill half a million people yearly. How many innocent civilians will be left without access to energy as a consequence?

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Im sure NK was totally going to use a reactor built for nuclear submarines for.... civilian use, even though they annouced building a nuclear submarine a few months ago.

Oh, my bad, I assumed it was for civilian use.

[–] barnacul@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Russia is the only country with supercavitating torpedoes. However, the damage they cause wouldn't be any different than a conventional torpedo.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah I don't see how the blast damage would indicate the torpedoes propulsion type. Which makes me question the rest of the details.

[–] clucose@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So, somebody knows about those ships and is capable of sinking them. Why are not more sunk?