this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
309 points (97.8% liked)

World News

51525 readers
2821 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/40891725

White House pushing Sir Keir Starmer to make concessions on food standards

Donald Trump is demanding American chlorinated chicken be sold in British supermarkets.

The White House is pushing Sir Keir Starmer to make concessions on food standards in order to revive a transatlantic tech partnership that drastically collapsed on Tuesday.

Jamieson Greer, the US trade envoy, wants Britain to accept hormone-treated chicken and beef, a term he was not able to achieve when the wider US-UK trade deal was first signed in May.

“He is seeking to use the tech partnership as leverage on trade deal concessions he still wants but that didn’t get the first round,” a source close to the negotiations told The Telegraph.

The US pulled the tech prosperity agreement over complaints Britain’s Online Safety Act would police American AI companies. Washington is using this complaint in order to secure fresh compromises in its trade deal with London, The Telegraph understands.

Insiders say the tech agreement collapsed in part because of the absence of an ambassador to Washington, a post which has remained vacant since Lord Mandelson was fired in September over his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

No, it all does. It's not Safe. You can stick it up your bum.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

"La la la I make up my own facts" is an embarrassing stance to upvote, let alone put forth as an honest argument.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-47440562

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7015476/

There's ongoing study about safe exposure levels, but the usefulness of animal studies is limited (mice are a poor metabolic analogue). The World Health Organization stands by 0.7mg/liter in water for chlorate and the key thing being looked at is how much remains on food as residue.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

No one is saying the chlorine is unsafe. Do you think they don't treat municipal water in the UK? They do. This is about chlorinating chicken as part of processing, and the reasons it isn't needed in the UK and is in the US are in your own BBC article.

And as far as I'm concerned, none of that matters. The UK has a set of standards you must meet to sell chicken there. If you want to sell your chicken, meet their standards. My country requires labeling in French for a variety of products. Same thing. If you want to sell those things here, get labels with French.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Literally the person I am replying to is saying it's unsafe.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

They say "it". One could assume it refers to the chlorine, or one could assume it's the banned product that is treated with chlorine. Which one someone decides they're referring to probably has to do with how disingenuous that person is being, given the rest of the topic is about chlorinated chicken and not the process itself.