this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
809 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

78098 readers
2623 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are 1.3 billion people in China and you can read the report to see their satisfaction with a variety of metrics from the indifference of local officials to their participation in public health programs, over the past however many years

I hope you understand that even a 5% disapproval rate for something in China is still somewhere near 70 million people. There are only 11 million uyghurs in China. Do you not see how if you add up all the people who approve and disapprove you get the same ballpark numbers the study is claiming?

Just do the math lol

[–] phar@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Likewise 30,000 people out of 1.3 billion is not going to be representative. Again do you have any other peer-reviewed studies or are you just basing your entire beliefs of one small sample study?

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That’s not how statistics works at all. A sample of 30,000 people out of 1,300,000,000 is in fact highly representative. Please go look up how sample sizes work because there is no way to have a meaningful conversation if you don’t understand basic statistics.

[–] phar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So no other peer reviewed studies then? You're a one article is absolute kind of guy? Good luck out there.

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I suppose that makes you a 'doesn't understand statistics and ignores the evidence' kind of guy 🤷‍♀️

Good luck out there.

[–] phar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I recommend you actually look up statistical relevance And what that means Compared to proof