this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
211 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

13041 readers
794 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca
UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
211
CD PROJEKT and GOG co-founder Michał Kiciński acquires GOG from CD PROJEKT (www.gamingonlinux.com)
submitted 17 hours ago by cm0002@lemy.lol to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

GOG is breaking off from CD PROJEKT with 100% of it now owned by one of the original co-founders, Michał Kiciński, who is a co-founder of both GOG and CD PROJEKT.

With this move, GOG will continue operating independently but there's an agreement that's been signed between CD PROJEKT and GOG for future cooperation including releasing games on GOG from CD PROJEKT RED. The purchase of GOG came at a cost of PLN 90.7 million and Kiciński continues holding their shares in CD PROJEKT too as co-founder but now owns 100% of the shares in GOG.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I'm not an expert by any means and find this a little confusing too. The three possibilities seem like:

  1. The business needed a cash influx and because CD Projekt and Michał Kiciński still seem to believe in GOG's mission, "purchasing it" was a way of injecting money while setting a ceiling on risk for CD Projekt versus simply keeping it on the balance sheet and spending more on it.

  2. They truly think that separate businesses will operate more efficiently and that the missions weren't aligned enough to be in the same org structure. This seems possible but no way to really know.

  3. They want to make GOG more appealing to developers who may not trust it if it's tied so closely to CD Projekt. This seems unlikely, since Epic, Valve, etc all have self-published games by the platform owners on their storefronts.

Or some combination of the three... The timing seems to be to do it by end of calendar year to make a clean break on the books, at least.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 1 points 1 hour ago

Could also be a case of Michał Kiciński truly believing in the mission statement of GOG and wanting to free the organisation of any shareholders to be beholden to so that GOG can operate at near-breakeven if need be instead of having to maximise profits to please shareholders.

This is of course giving him a massive benefit of the doubt, but I guess I still have a sliver of hope for humanity somewhere in my rotten applecore of a heart.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Definitely feels like both 1 & 2.