For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
Another chud
It should be noted that the typical Hollywood diversity in casting is, SHOCKINGLY, missing when it comes to human colonists, who are essentially all white and even referred to as “pink-skins” by Na’vi.
Which I’m sure means nothing :)) a very innocent creative choice :)))))
Damn right, face the wall cracker 
Long Live Jakesully 
Having seen only Avatar: it's very entertaining as an enormous budget blockbuster that isn't completely morally bankrupt (as opposed to the usual defenders of the status quo capeslop) but I think it's fair to say it's not a visionary film. It's forgettable, generic, and has "unobtainium." You don't have to love it.
Again I only saw the first one but I hardly think they could be solid in every aspect. Every aspect? That's ridiculous.
First of all, they could stand to be a lot gayer. There's no time travel. Glaring lack of basketball B plot (leaving the basketball court in the base as an unfired Chekhov's gun). At best, I can give them points for tall women and hair sex. But my checklist's boxes are bereft of marks here.
It’s okay to hate Hollywood movies. Avatar is not not some cinematic masterpiece
I don't recall the first one super well, but the second one was genuinely wretched in so many ways. Even the visual effects which were touted so much just felt artless in their photorealism.