this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2025
672 points (98.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

10152 readers
3508 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tibi@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It also lacked a lot of system calls, like ability to loop mount.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Loop mounting is implemented as a separate syscall? But why? I'd expect it to be a parametric thing like mount("loop", ...)
ლ(•ᯅ• )ლ

Or do you just mean the whole feature was absent? I'm less surprised by that than the fact that loop mounting might be a separate syscall. Considering stuff like the fact that in NTFS, symlinks to files and to directories are two different things, and the program creating a symlink must distinguish which target it needs.

[–] tibi@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Mounting in general is a system call, loop mounting is the particular case that is required for features like snap to work