this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2025
707 points (97.7% liked)

Bluesky

1798 readers
349 users here now

People skeeting stuff.

Bluesky Social is a microblogging social platform being developed in conjunction with the decentralized AT Protocol. Previously invite-only, the flagship Beta app went public in February 2024. All are welcome!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] D1re_W0lf@piefed.world 147 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Actually there’s dozens of really good free / open source apps that can do that. Let’s face it, forgetting to flatten the edited version is not a technical problem. It’s a laziness one.

[–] core@leminal.space 110 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

One of the few communities I miss on reddit...

[–] Burninator05@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Its still there but is a shadow of what it used to be. Lots of AI karma farming submissions.

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 days ago

It turned into a suspended disbelief creative writing exercise sub long before bots were it's main problem. It was "I hate my Boss/Partner NoSleep"

[–] lauha@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

More likely ignorance or incompetence instead of laziness

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

is sleep deprivation ignorance, incompetence or laziness?

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

More so on management's end, but yes.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah I'm not sure, but haven't spent any time really looking through them. I've seen some images that were clearly scanned and the size reduced so you couldnt read words in the image you'd think they would have scanned the redacted files as well to the same PDF dump or whatever, which had they done would have flattened them. To me it seems more of a we "properly" redacted and covered up files for some people, and we didn't care as much about others. Whether or not they were trying to allow for those people to be "accidentally" found is a possibility, but who knows

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

A lot of open source applications can't be used by government agencies because the pedigree of the software can't be verified, so you can't be sure foreign entities didn't add any code.

But really there's a million ways to do this - even whatever application they used would have been fine if they simply printed out the redacted files and rescanned them.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 days ago

Could be sabotage

[–] jagermo@feddit.org 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, but you need to onboard those and run them through IT due dilligence. That is annoying in the best companies - i would not want to procure a new Software tool in a gouvernement setting.

[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

It’s unpleasant to get any software approved in the government

[–] Restaldt@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

You mean screenshot and paint right?

Maybe someone intentionally poorly censored it. This problem is so easy to avoid.