this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2025
37 points (100.0% liked)

History

23929 readers
13 users here now

Welcome to c/history! History is written by the posters.

c/history is a comm for discussion about history so feel free to talk and post about articles, books, videos, events or historical figures you find interesting

Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Do not post reactionary or imperialist takes (criticism is fine, but don't pull nonsense from whatever chud author is out there).

When sharing historical facts, remember to provide credible souces or citations.

Historical Disinformation will be removed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

China and India were the most important places on Earth for almost all of history. The "Near East," the "Far East," Africa, and the Americas all had advanced empires at times, and most outstripped Europe technologically for most of history. The Ottomans famously made use of gunpowder before Europeans, but the Chinese were (of course) the first to weaponize it.

So what enabled Europeans to so successfully dominate the world? Obviously it wasn't their exceptional genetics or superior "culture," or even, I think, the massive experience in organized murder from Europeans all killing each other. Was it Capitalism? Industrialization? Agriculture? Did the massive trade network encompassing half the globe create a population with a huge array of immune disease carriers?

Notably, the "Scramble for Africa" happened much later than the settling of the Americas. Did the wealth sucked out of the Americas allow the Europeans to do something that would've been previously impossible (or at least not worth the effort)?

I know this is kind of a massive question to answer and I'm sure it's very contested, but I'd appreciate any responses and any book recommendations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thefunkycomitatus@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago

I had a similar question so I looked up stuff about the Spanish and how it worked around Columbus (even though the concept predates him). In short, yes, they gained experience through a long history of infighting and conquering each other. The Spanish had some expeditions into Africa in the late 14th century which were quite profitable for them. They captures slaves and created sugar plantations on the Canary Islands. Plus there was all the stuff with the Reconquista which was the model for their colonialism. The same behaviors and policies from that period become the Encomienda System for colonies. The conquering of neighbors and forcing them to pay tribute had worked out really well for Spain. Encomienda did that but for colonies. The crown also made it legal for nobles to fund their own expeditions in return for a grant of the profits. If you squint really hard you can see capitalism taking shape.

Colonialism was fairly rational for the monarchy and investors. It had proven to make people very rich. For the monarchy, it was a cheap way to get huge returns. Columbus' first voyage only cost about 1% of the annual revenues for the Kingdom. The crown paid about 90% of the cost of the voyage, leaving the rest up to solo investors. Columbus debt financed the rest through Italian banks.

It's culmination of everything that came before, driven in the direction of chasing profits. Culturally, cruelty was a virtue and that helped justify the violence in pursuit of wealth.