this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2025
445 points (99.6% liked)

Steam Hardware

20117 readers
140 users here now

A place to discuss and support all Steam Hardware, including Steam Deck, Steam Machine, Steam Frame, and SteamOS in general.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Deck] - Steam Deck related.
[Machine] - Steam Machine related.
[Frame] - Steam Frame related.
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

If your post is only relevant to one hardware device (Deck/Machine/Frame/etc) please specify which one as part of the title or by using a device flair.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 16 points 3 days ago (3 children)

To quote Rtings:

under normal circumstances, with mixed usage, burn-in isn't an issue

Even if your task bar is on 70% of the time, you're not going to see any significant burn-in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ot1gr-YypY4&t=208

[–] Flames5123@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

Right? Even just turning off the screen every day is good enough for the life of the screen.

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Every Android phone I've owned with an OLED screen (including modern ones) have had burn-in (or rather, burn-out) problems, specifically with the status bar.

If I had a choice, I would still be using LCDs on phones.

Also on TVs with modern backlighting technology, LCDs are remarkably close to OLEDs in terms of picture quality.

[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 10 points 3 days ago

Phone AMOLED screens are entirely different beasts compared to QD-OLED/WOLED on TVs and monitors.

Phone OLEDs are much more dense, run much hotter and brighter, most also lack pixel shifting and many even pixel refreshing.

I also had some severe burn-in on phones.

[–] arschfidel@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Really? That's interesting, because I've never noticed burn-in on any of my OLED phones, even though I did use them for many years each. But then again, I've always wondered why seemingly nobody talks about burn-in on phones, while there is a lot of fuzz being made around it on computer monitors.

[–] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

During normal use I wouldn't notice until I started reading webtoons and manga on my phone which shows a lot of white color that you don't typically see. And that's when I'd see the burn in my screen had picked up.

As for why there is more fuss about monitors than phones is because people use monitors for many more years than phones. And can use them for many more hours with lot of static elements with sometimes one program being used day in and day out. Its same reason why there is less talk of burn in for TVs versus monitors where TVs are more likely to have constantly changing visuals than monitor use case.

[–] jerb@lemmy.croc.pw 3 points 3 days ago

I actually just checked this on my Pixel 7 the other day. I have no noticeable burn in, not even in the status bar, except for the pill at the bottom of the screen. I've had the phone for almost three years.

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

What kind of time frame were they testing over? Not seeing any significant burn in means something completely different if they're testing for one year versus ten, especially for people who don't like replacing things that aren't totally unusable yet.