this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2025
23 points (96.0% liked)

Canada

10775 readers
399 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

B.C. Premier David Eby defended his right to criticize court decisions despite organizations that represent lawyers calling his recent comments unfair and irresponsible.

“The idea that the premier should not comment, should not indicate any position on the court decisions, is patently absurd,” Eby said in an interview in his office. “I will continue to point out that I think the decisions are unhelpful.”

The Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia said Eby was “undermining public confidence in the justice system” and his comments “reflect a troubling national trend in which politicians use the courts as punching bags to score political points.”

It quoted association president Rebecca McConchie reminding politicians that the courts are part of a system of checks and balances. “The job of the court is not to be helpful to the government. It is to interpret and apply the law without fear or favour.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Undermine the rule of law?

Wtf. No.

He's literally going to change the law because the courts interpreted a currently written law in a way that wasn't intended. And he should know, he voted for that law so he can definitely remember his intentions.

That's well within how democracy works. He's the fucking premier.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Can you sauce us up? From my readings the court noted that the land was never under treaty and the government unlawfully sold private land rights of land that was unceded.

Like me selling your house while you are on an extended vacation. Just because I did that, does not make it legal ownership.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Thanks for sauces. The mineral rights issue, makes sense. I was thinking it was the private land rights of residential areas that was recently creating a big stir