this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
47 points (100.0% liked)
philosophy
20217 readers
2 users here now
Other philosophy communities have only interpreted the world in various ways. The point, however, is to change it. [ x ]
"I thunk it so I dunk it." - Descartes
Short Attention Span Reading Group: summary, list of previous discussions, schedule
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
There is no "enabling" consciousness. Consciousness is simply first person experience. The hum of the machine. It's all calculations all at once aimed toward homeostasis. We can pick away every sense you have until there is no consciousness left.
Consciousness seems to be agentic. A unified experience that the universe obviously doesn't have because we are subjectively experiencing it.
We can certainly point to specific physical properties that prevent consciousness from ever arising. If I snap froze your brain you would lose consciousness, if we snap unfroze you you would resume consciousness from the moment we unfroze you.
Are all computational devices conscious? If not, why not?
I do think we will recreate consciousness by computer means, our current computers are not conscious as we currently define it as they do not really attempt to achieve homeostasis.