philosophy

20217 readers

2 users here now

Other philosophy communities have only interpreted the world in various ways. The point, however, is to change it. [ x ]

"I thunk it so I dunk it." - Descartes

Short Attention Span Reading Group: summary, list of previous discussions, schedule

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net

MiraculousMM@hexbear.net

Leon_Grotsky@hexbear.net

What do you think of panpsychism/the hard problem of consciousness? (hexbear.net)

submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by itsPina@hexbear.net to c/philosophy@hexbear.net

241 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Personally I think it's silly as hell. Qualia is obviously a biological component of experience... Not some weird thing that science will never be able to put in to words.

I've been listening to a lot of psychology podcasts lately and for some reason people seem obsessed with the idea despite you needing to make the same logical leaps to believe it as any sort of mysticism... Maybe I am just tripping idk

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] fox@hexbear.net 11 points 3 weeks ago

That last one seems unlikely just off the weight of similarity to all other life. What's the cutoff for a thing to have a soul? Only humans? Which protohuman met that threshold? Species are a social construct after all, biology is very happy to let humans and neanderthals breed viable offspring. Do all mammals have souls? Elephants perform funerary rites, but so do some birds. Is there a neuron count or brain structure that a soul lives in? Why wouldn't a whale have a soul with those mega huge brains?