this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
47 points (100.0% liked)

philosophy

20217 readers
2 users here now

Other philosophy communities have only interpreted the world in various ways. The point, however, is to change it. [ x ]

"I thunk it so I dunk it." - Descartes


Short Attention Span Reading Group: summary, list of previous discussions, schedule

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Personally I think it's silly as hell. Qualia is obviously a biological component of experience... Not some weird thing that science will never be able to put in to words.

I've been listening to a lot of psychology podcasts lately and for some reason people seem obsessed with the idea despite you needing to make the same logical leaps to believe it as any sort of mysticism... Maybe I am just tripping idk

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Yllych@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Neurons have a specific electrical function and interconnection that we can demonstrate experimentally.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes but that specific mechanism has never been demonstrated to have anything to do with consciousness beyond the fact that interrupting them also interrupts consciousness. If we're positing that consciousness is something that belongs to each individual part of the biological system, but then a singular consciousness that corresponds to the whole being can arise out of their interaction, why should that part of the process be limited purely to electrical connections between neurons?

[–] Yllych@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

I'm not saying it has to be limited to only neurons, but until there's a way to test whether or not entire ecosystems can have a consciousness like ours then I am skeptical of these claims