154
Assange files criminal complaint against Nobel Foundation: Peace prize isn’t a war fund
(sweden.news-pravda.com)
this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
154 points (96.4% liked)
World News
38695 readers
812 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Why? Because he as an anti imperialist who risked his life for humanity didn't get one and this obvious faud did?
Yes.
'Yes, he exposed American war crimes, but then Trump won instead of Hillary, and I didn't get my healthcare treats for murdering brown people."
Also, imagine taking the rape smear against any opponent of western imperialism seriously in 2025.
That was his earlier release in 2010.
In 2015 he had Democrat and Republican emails but only released Democrat emails.
Do provide a source. A quick ai check on your comment says you're lying.
If the imperialist AI claims there is no merit to the claim without sources and the OP provides no sources then I will not waste time on it.
You go ahead and waste hours on gish galloping concern trolls which have now been proven to be wrong after asking for a source and they had none as expected. They are not worth more than an AI paste for me.
On 7 October, WikiLeaks began publishing emails from Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta.[296] On 15 October, the Ecuadorian government severed Assange's Internet connection from until December because of election interference.[297] According to surveillance reports of Assange provided by UC Global, on 19 October, associates of Assange removed boxes covered with blankets and about 100 hard drives from the embassy.[298]
In November 2016, WikiLeaks asked Donald Trump Jr. to share a WikiLeaks tweet with the made-up quote "Can't we just drone this guy?" which the website True Pundit claimed that Hillary Clinton had made about Assange.[299] After the election, WikiLeaks and Assange requested that the president-elect Donald Trump push Australia to appoint Assange as ambassador to the US.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Assange
No your source that he hid GOP mails. This is not what you claimed.
Wikipedia isn't a source
The quotes I used from Wikipedia have footnotes to the actual sources.
Then you sounds have cited those actual sources. Also obviously the footnotes don't work in quotes. You seriously just included a bunch of random numbers in your quote and are now acting like that makes it more credible.
I provided the link to the Wikipedia that has the sources. I'm not obligated to do anything for you.
And I actually went and checked those sources, and turns out they don't actually say what your quote says they say. No wonder you refused to quote them directly, knowing they didn't support you. (I'm just kidding: obviously you never bothered to check them. Wikipedia is religious scripture to you, divine truth, and the little blue numbers are just sigils of divine power that you never think to actually click through
So he didn't release DNC emails to make Hillary look bad? He didn't get Trump Jr to promote a lie about what Hillary said? He didn't try to use his election interference to get an ambassador position from Trump?
The only thing I was wrong about was that he had RNC emails. Russia never gave them to him.
That's not what's in your Wikipedia quote, you dishonest asshole
"So he didn’t release DNC emails to make Hillary look bad?"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2018/07/13/timeline-how-russian-agents-allegedly-hacked-the-dnc-and-clintons-campaign/
" He didn’t get Trump Jr to promote a lie about what Hillary said? "
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2016/10/no-clinton-didnt-say-she-wanted-to-drone-strike-assange.html
" He didn’t try to use his election interference to get an ambassador position from Trump?"
https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/julian-assange-trump-jr-wikileaks-ambassador-offer-dm-messages-twitter-a8055021.html
The Wikipedia article I linked earlier has links to every source. I've now provided them for you.
That’s not what’s in your Wikipedia quote, you dishonest asshole
I literally quoted each and every line from my post along with the corresponding Wikipedia quote from my post AND THE SOURCE.
"The only thing I was wrong about was that he had RNC emails."
What the fuck is wrong with you?
No you didn't
I have no idea what you are arguing about.
The post that referenced Wikipedia had 3 claims with sources:
Assange released DNC emails.
Assange had Trump Jr post a lie about Hillary.
Assange asked Trump for an ambassadorship.
Which of these did I not provide sources?
I have said 2 times that I was wrong about Assange not releasing RNC emails because Russia didn't give them to him.
What exactly is the problem you are seeing?
No it didn't
You didn't answer my question.
Because you lied
That's still not an answer to the question.
Please quote the lie.
You're welcome to read back through the thread to see the lie
Despite your constant aggression, I asked you to please quote it. If you can't do it, that makes you the liar.
No, that is not how that works
You made the assertion that I am a liar. You need to support your assertion.
I did
Repeating, "You are a liar." isn't proof. It is the assertion you need to show evidence of.
I think it's now clear you keep repeating, "You are a liar." while refusing to provide any proof is because you don't have any evidence.
You’re welcome to read back through the thread to see the lie
I can't prove what isn't there.
Only you can prove your assertion.
Ok
It’s fun seeing you grasp at straws.
Go back to Reddit you loser
Source?
Which part do you need corroboration for? Most of those were statements of opinion. Is there one in particular you disagree with?
Assange turning down 68GB from the Russians on purpose to spread propaganda and no other reason.
These are hyper imperialist newspapers which justify the genocide in Gaza they're not a source and they don't provide anything special.
I'm not expecting Assagne to make enemies of Russia while he needs them to hide from prosecution by the West. Besides these Russia leaks were seemingly not being very significant and indeed not verifiable FT and Wapo are obviously looking for slander.
As for the RT news show give me a break you're linking genocide outlets you don't care about any of that. Were he to have to stick to "reputable news" only he would be allowed nowhere because that doesn't exist. Unless Assange was actively lying on there it doesnt matter.
I don't care about the literal American state ran propaganda campaign you're bringing up. Now since all you have against Assange are adhoms, and apparently doing a show on Russian state TV propaganda is dishonest but doing one with American state propaganda is awesome and reliable, I think you should reconsider what the word news even means.
Assange exposed massive amounts of US war crimes and actual propaganda and American brainwashing and paid for it with half his life. Because "muh press freedom".
Assange was human and had some faults wow how awful.
Liberals will find any reason to denounce a hero but defend mass murderers like Obama and Hillary Clinton in the same breath.