this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2025
326 points (99.7% liked)
science
23416 readers
556 users here now
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
rule #1: be kind
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Hominins. Fuckin shit up since 398,000 BCE.
According to your link and the linked Wikipedia article, that word includes the non-human great apes, which seems rather unfair. It's only the genus homo within the family of hominids who discovered fire. "Human" is probably fine, depending on the exact definition used it can definitely include our direct ancestor species while excluding chimpanzees. But it can definitely also be understood to mean specifically homo sapiens, so there's a lot of potential for misunderstandings.
There is a difference between hominins and hominids. The link I posted is regarding hominins.
If you click on the link to "Hominini" in the Wiktionary article, it says "Hominini - A taxonomic tribe within the family Hominidae – humans; or the chimpanzees and humans."
Granted, that's different from what I said, as it's only the chimpanzees that might be included, but according to Wiktionary it just isn't clear cut.
it also notes that chimpanzees are not always included within hominini
has noone ever told a chimp to make fire? like with a lighter?
There's a whole line of movies about this concept
Sheesh, these are tough—sounds the same but has different meanings. Didn’t know that problem went so far back.