Selfhosted

60543 readers

307 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

Be civil.
No spam.
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the link in Rule 8 for details.
AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post. )

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

395

Lightweight and flexible: Bitwarden lite self-host deployment is now generally available | Bitwarden (bitwarden.com)

submitted 6 months ago by otters_raft@lemmy.ca to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

45 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Bitwarden lite self-host deployment, formerly unified, is now generally available! This self-host option is a more lightweight and flexible deployment alternative, ideal for homelab enthusiasts and community members who want to get started quickly with self-hosting Bitwarden. With the release of general availability, Bitwarden lite users can benefit from enhanced performance and reliability.

Seems to be an official alternative to Vaultwarden

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago

I think it's nice they offer their own lite version.

Just because there is a more popular OSS solution doesn't mean they should be complacent and accept people will use Vaultwarden.

This shows they support their users directly instead of just letting their users fend for themselves.

They also could indirectly be blamed by some people using vaultwarden should an issue arise with it.

By publishing the first party lite version they can say "well you're not using our supported version". While still being friendly to self-hosters.