Videos

232 readers

16 users here now

founded 9 months ago

MODERATORS

Deceptichum@quokk.au

A drop of whiskey vs bacteria [01:01] (v.redd.it)

submitted 4 months ago by cm0002@lemmy.cafe to c/videos@quokk.au

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I'm not sure what this is trying to say... Yes, alcohol kills bacteria. This is known. If you got caught in a flash flood of it, like these bacteria are, you'd die, too. It kinda feels like it's trying to tell you alcohol is bad, but it's using disingenuous arguments.

[–] Tagger@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

I took the opposite argument from it. If I'm ill, I just need more whiskey.

[–] Cybersec@piefed.social 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It was a good message or bit of info for me, as I had always been skeptical of using liquor as an antibacterial helper in wounds like you see in movies. (I thought maybe the proof was too low or something) but this shows me it’s definitely better than nothing.

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Yeah, just maybe aim for Navy Poof or Cask Strength. Try to get over 60%.

[–] miasmati@lemmings.world 3 points 4 months ago

It's like a whiskey tsunami