this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2025
41 points (100.0% liked)
askchapo
23189 readers
31 users here now
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
-
Posts must ask a question.
-
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
-
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
-
Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I know the question is partially a meme but since you posted in this comm, I'm gonna answer sincerely.
People like Arch because it comes as stock as possible to function as a computer. It doesn't come with any/many installed programs, codecs, drivers, etc. All the stuff that other distros and Windows include so that the average user doesn't wonder why the hell their videos won't play or they don't have any image thumbnails.
It gives you near full control over what you put on your system and what you don't. That's baked into the ideology of its development. As more services are turned into subscription only garbage and Microsoft has tried to control what people are allowed to do with their devices, that desire becomes stronger.
The other part is because its "anti-bloat" as opposed to stuff like Windows and Ubuntu that come with tons of software and services installed you may not even use. Think "why would I want Candy Crush preinstalled on my phone if I'm never going to play it?" It doesn't really matter that it only takes a negligible amount of space. You never asked for it.
With the arch install script, its not really hard to get up and running today, so has lost some of its elitist perception. Some people still insist you install it manually, which won't "teach you about Linux" and is just nerd cope for those who like maximum control.
It's a good distro and tbh I had fewer issues with it than Fedora Workstation, once I knew what to install to fix my problem. But I don't really recommend people use it if you're newly coming from Windows because there are products like Bazzite or even EndeavourOS which is based on Arch but comes with everything else someone would expect as a basic function of their OS.
And with things like Distrobox allowing you to make containers out of any distro that seamlessly integrate with your desktop, it doesn't make a lot of sense to have something relatively less stable as your base distro.
Edit: it also has something called the Arch User Repository (AUR) that allows you to install almost anything that may not typically be packaged for your distro. But in reality its full of unsupported and buggy packages from random developers and also doesn't have many advantages over something like Flatpaks or Appimages that are also distro agnostic. But it's a core piece of why people like the distro, because everything is made by the community, rather than corporations like with Fedora and Ubuntu.
Is Ubuntu a corporation? I thought they were a private company that functionally operated like a non-profit? I disagree with a lot of their decisions but haven't yet seen reason to doubt their intentions.
You're correct, that is what Canonical is. The distinction though is just that Canonical, System76, Tuxedo, Red Hat, SUSE, etc have a profit motive for what they do even if they're only loosely connected to the parent organization like Fedora and OpenSUSE. I don't think they're uniquely bad or anything (except I'm a Snap hater), but any distro that is primarily associated with a company doesn't really fit the Arch ethos of a fully community developed project. So a lot of anti-corp and freedom maxxers use it.
TBF snap is the fucking worst
That makes sense. In theory Debian is my favorite just because of their form of organization but in practice Ubuntu or Mint are much easier ways to get people out of the Microsoft pipeline because of accessibility and significantly better ethics. Debian and Arch are more practical after some Linux experience is gained.