I do not really have a body for this. I was not aware that this is a thing and still feel like this is bs, but maybe there is an actual explanation for HDMI Forum's decision that I am missing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 34 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Display Port would be better suited to do all of those things.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Usb-c supports DisplayPort! Long live open standards!

[–] Fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Except DisplayPort has high data transfer speed requirements and many cables that fit the nice reversible ports do not support it.

Source: me testing every cable at home to find one that supports DP + PD

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago

We really do need better cable identification standards for usb-c. Like electrical and cat cables have had this better addressed for a while now.

[–] gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

are USB-C ports that do display using displayport standards to do it anyway?

[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, they do. You just need a fitting cable, which supports the bandwidth.