this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
4 points (55.6% liked)

Space

1961 readers
113 users here now

A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  2. Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics

Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instance’s local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.


Related Communities

🔭 Science

🚀 Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You claim the author gave a suggestion of what is inside black holes.

It very clearly does.

If you can't see that you're illiterate.

Then you get mad at me pointing that out and start crying for apologies online. Fucking lol

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A suggestion in a scientific paper isn't anything you pull out of your ass.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Back to commenting on the content, despite me not at any point talking about it with you. I merely pointed out you read it poorly — which you did. Now stop crying over it and just leave rhe thread alone if you're so ashamed.

"apologise to meeeee REEEEEEEE"

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Back to commenting on the content,

You just commented on the content. You can't have it both ways.

You comment on the content by claiming he gave a suggestion.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Jesus fucking hell. You just can't accept you made mistake while reading. I really hope you are 15-25. If you're over 26 and still this childishly stubborn because you're incapable of accepting you make mistakes, then you'll be like that as long as you live. Fucking eww.

You didn't understand what the author meant. You were wrong that they "just restated the definition".

Carry on with your tantrum if you want man, it won't change you having been wrong.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

From what I’ve gathered you are in a constant state of throwing a tantrum and you sound like a stupid 12 year old as far as your ability to process information, who the fuck are you to talk, you dumb ass entitled little cunt?

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, I'm the one who sounds like they're having a silly tantrum, when you can't even reply without "dumb-ass (that's how you spell it, just to educate you a bit) entitled little cunt".

Do you genuinely think a kid like you saying "cunt" to me shakes in any way? I've had 2m tall fully tatted up criminals yell at me how they're gonna kill and maim and torture me and my family if I don't [whatever shit they were wanting to do at the time.]

Do you know why you get so angry? Because you hate the facts. You hate that you don't understand the subject, you hate that I know that, you hate that you're too lazy to read up this, despite this argument already having gone several days, during which you could've educated yourself.

But you chose not to.

Because fuck science right, you're not giving up your legal speed even when you have it with a false excuse.

Addicts are so fkin easy to read :DD

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Jesus christ, you are fucking hilarious.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I've seen this exact model of behaviour a thousand times.

Just spend a few minutes reading up on what neurodevelopmental disorders are, mkay?

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Spend a few minutes reading up on NPD, you jackass.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Oh no, not a JACKASS! However will I face the next day, knowing that someone online has compared me to an equine of low standing! Noooo!

Almost as bad as having a meltdown for everyone to see, because you couldn'tbe arsed to google "neurodevelopmental disorder" before showing everyone your ignorance and childish attitude. But I'm the narcissist for using a forum to... write things. Tell me again how you're deluding yourself that that makes sense?

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

So you can’t even look up NPD, you’re that dumb, you can’t even admit that you’re too scared to even learn something? You’re such an addict to your narcissistic ways.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I honestly can't tell if he's serious or trolls for fun. I looked at his other posts and he does the same childish hostility everywhere.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

He’s just a run of the mill narcissist, they don’t really believe in anything.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

You're literally spamming a forum despite not being able to even say anything. You don't realise how ridiculous you look?