Economics

993 readers

22 users here now

founded 2 years ago

124

FACT FOCUS: Trump says tariffs can eventually replace federal income taxes. Experts disagree (apnews.com)

submitted 3 days ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/economics@lemmy.world

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Donald Trump has long praised tariffs as key to increasing wealth in the United States, idealizing Gilded Age policies that preceded the implementation of a modern federal income tax.

Among the potential benefits, Trump claims, is the ability to replace revenue from federal income taxes with money the U.S. is taking in from tariffs — a concept he has touted since his 2024 presidential campaign, most recently at a Cabinet meeting Tuesday.

But tariff revenue doesn’t even come close to where it would need to be if federal income taxes were eliminated, and experts say such a plan isn’t at all feasible.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 40 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Regressive tax plan. Just like sales tax.

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Even if it wasn't regressive (which it is) it still wouldn't work to replace income tax. The tariffs incentivize domestication of production, so people are literally incentivized to circumvent them. That's also (lol) one of the stated goals here - being back manufacturing. But you can't use tariffs to both bring back manufacturing and replace income tax or even a substantial part of it in the short term anyways. It's really just one or the other. Realistically, given the competence with which they're going about it, it'll be neither.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Oh and we're not going to tariff luxury cars but do have enormous tariff on jeans and bananas. Wonder who would possibly benefit from such a system design? I'm not very smart so can't quite put it together, a total mystery.