this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2025
519 points (98.3% liked)

2meirl4meirl

232 readers
286 users here now

Welcome to 2meirl4meirl

Memes that are too dark for most. Post responsibly, cry collectively.

Rule 1: Respect the CommunityIf you’re not into self-deprecating, dark, or suicidal humor, this isn’t the place for you. Kindly block and move on. This is just how some of us cope

Rule 2: Respect One AnotherWe’re here to laugh through the pain, not to make it worse.

  • No harassment
  • No bigotry (transphobia, racism, sexism, etc.)
  • Don’t be malicious

Rule 3: Title RequirementAll post titles must be 2meirl4meirl.

  • Makes posting lazy and easy
  • Lets people who don’t want this humor avoid it

Rule 4: No Forbidden FormatsThe usual stuff applies:

  • No spam
  • No illegal content
  • No porn or explicit content
  • NSFW content must be properly tagged

If you see a post that breaks the rules, please report it.

Otherwise post your memes, share your pain, and salute your fellow sadpeeps

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 79 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Remember maintaining a household used to be considered a full time occupation for 1 adult per household.

We need to bring that idea back and separate it from gendered labor. 1 adult's full time pay should always cover the cost of a home and family

[–] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 2 points 5 hours ago

Instead of that, we now have unaffordable housing, which forces you into serial tenancies. The rent prices are so high you need to live with one or more people. All of you must work to make the rent. Also there's a deposit, so you must somehow keep on top of the housekeeping, or you will owe money to the landlord. If that sounds unfair and ridiculous, that'll be because it is. But if you complain, you'll be the one that's crazy, because that's just the way the world works

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That was also established back before dishwashers, laundry machines, refrigerators (so you can go shopping every couple weeks instead of every day), public school, etc. Modern conveniences streamline a lot of domestic tasks.

I still think a single income should support a family, but maintaining a household isn't as labor intensive as it once was.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The 1950s had basically all of that and the standard was still the same. Before that extended family households were more common and the labor was spread to multiple adults and children had more expectations

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Those were all pretty new in the '50s, plus that's about when women started entering the workforce in greater volume, and also when you start to see the stereotype of housewives sitting at home eating bonbons.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

These conveniences have become necessitates though.

I work to buy a dishwasher to wash my dishes so I have more time to work. It's trapping us in a consumption cycle

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not really? You'll have to wash dishes anyway, and it only takes like 10-20 hours of work to pay it off. It's not like it's a consumable or subscription service.

Again, that doesn't mean I'm pro-consumption, but certain appliances just objectively save time and make your life easier.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You took that too literally. It's not about the dishwasher per se it's about the whole lifestyle.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works -2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

How so? There's a difference between constant mindless consumption and buying tools that save you time and effort. If you wanna talk TVs and jet skis and designer bags, yes obviously you have a point. But that's not the same as labor saving appliances.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

Convinces aren't made to save us time and effort. Back to the example of the household all the modern conveniences did was decrease the about of labor needed to maintain a home.

Did that surplus of labor help us? No now conveniences became necessary because households required a dual income.

If all the modern conveniences saved a home maker 30 hours per week those did not become free. That labor went to making quarterly profits. Now you need 2 adults working so you have to buy these things to have any time to do other things

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

Now you need 2 adults working so you have to buy these things to have any time to do other things

And the assumption becomes that everyone has those things and can therefore work even more. For pay that hasn't kept pace with inflation for decades.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I don't see the connection here. I think you're drawing a cause-effect relationship here that doesn't exist. Dual incomes aren't necessary because we have appliances, it's because wages haven't kept up with productivity or inflation. I don't see how you're coming to the conclusion that it's somehow a direct consequence of labor saving appliances.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Once again being too literal it's the whole system conveniences are just a part of that

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago

But you're conflating different aspects of the system. Modern conveniences aren't the product of capitalism, they're the product of human invention. Yes they were produced under capitalism, but they would've been developed under any economic system that supports human invention.

The consumption trap you're talking about, the whole "Working jobs we hate, to buy things we don't need, to impress people we don't like" thing, is a separate thing. Dishwashers and refrigerators aren't the same as jetskis and handbags.

[–] kurwa@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

2 part timers should be able to work also

[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As long as the math adds up. Right now you need 40 hours a day to do everything yourself

[–] offspec@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I assume you mean a week but I find what you wrote funnier

[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 5 points 23 hours ago

No, I meant a day. Like the meme in the post says, there's not enough hours in one day for one person to take care of everything.