this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
677 points (96.2% liked)

Today I Learned

26127 readers
1419 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Soviet system used psychiatry as a weapon by diagnosing political opponents as mentally ill in order to confine them as patients instead of trying them in court. Anyone who challenged the state such as dissidents, writers, would-be emigrants, religious believers, or human rights activists could be branded with fabricated disorders like sluggish schizophrenia. This turned normal political disagreement into supposed medical pathology and allowed the state to present dissent as insanity.

Once labeled in this way, people were placed in psychiatric hospitals where they could be held for long periods without legal protections. Harsh treatments were often used to break their resolve. The collaboration between state security organs and compliant psychiatrists created a system where political imprisonment was disguised as medical care, letting the Soviet regime suppress opposition while pretending it was addressing illness rather than silencing critics.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] leftascenter@jlai.lu 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The Soviet system

The Stalin system and kept later on... Rather far away from what a soviet system was supposed to be.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The road to hell is paved with good intentions and " supposed to be's. It didn't start with Stalin, even if he was one of the worst offenders. Whatever it was supposed to be, died in the cradle when a salty bitch named Vladimir Lenin. Who couldn't suffer losing the countries first democratic election. Ended any meaningful democracy when he appointed himself over the winner. Enabling Stalin.

[–] Bazell@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 days ago

Strong words expressed via bad writing. Somehow this makes your comment even better.

[–] clot27@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

democratic election is what brought us hitler, be glad to lenin. You cant have democracy when countries far richer than you are plotting against you. A true democracy is never possible under capitalist system

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Apathy and concentrated power gave us Hitler Stalin and Lenin. You can't dislike Hitler but like Lenin/Stalin without being a campist hypocrite.

[–] clot27@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Comparing lenin to hitler is the most shitlib thing youve ever done ( not that comparing stalin to him makes any sense)

Congrats

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world -3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Being called a shit-lib by campist tanky is quite a complement! Thanks pal! Your disproval Is a wonderful sign that I haven't lost touch with reality. Unlike some people.

Stalin and Hitler worked together to kill members of my family. It makes a lot of sense to compare them. I get that you think it's okay because he's your bad guy. Only other people's bad guys are bad.

[–] clot27@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I am not a tankie ( if you mean by tankie that someone who supports russia and china, which I absolutely dont ). What I want to convey is dismissing former socialism efforts by calling them authoritarian without seeing the material condition and circumstances that led to those authoritarian condition is dishonest.

Again comparing stalin and hitler when it was the red army which practically saved the world from being nazified. I get your personal experience with USSR maybe bad, that doesnt mean we will negate facts here.

As much energy you guys spend combating online tankies who are minute in number, had even a fraction of that energy been spent on stopping western imperialism in the 3rd world, maybe we wouldve been in better condition by now.

I support socialism, not authoritarianism. And there are multiple instances of socialism without authoritarianism, but in those case the CIA and other western imperialist forces did sabotage (e.g. burkina faso, chile, cuba, etc.), maybe thats the reason socialist experiments tend be authoritarian? Maybe libs should focus on sparring the 3rd world from ongoing colonial rule of western imperialists and not spend there tax dollars on civilising the rest of the world.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Have you ever heard of this never before said phrase? The ends don't justify the means.

It is inarguable that industrialization and automation can generally be a net benefit to mankind and society. It's also inarguable that that does not justify or excuse abuses in pursuit of it.

Industrialization and automation benefited a lot of people in America, too. Does that make what the United States did acceptable or justifiable? And if not, why not? You know what an actual shitlib/tankie take is. Our side did it, so that makes it okay.

Good things can happen in spite of bad leadership. How does that make bad leadership good?

[–] clot27@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The thing is, you guys automatically co relate socialism with authoritarianism and justify it through selective cases, most of which are western capitalist propaganda. Bad things happened in USSR? sure, does that make the socialist ideology bad? hell no. You would rarely see any liberal talking about the successes of socialist experiments, rather they will just dismiss them by calling it authoritarianism. Ends doesnt justify means but what led to bad things in those means should also be seen critically.

You literally compared lenin to hitler, that boggled my mind like lenin led peoples movement and overthrew tsarist russia and freed peasants and working class from feudal chains. Lenin was progressive, he didnt hated a certain ethnic group nor he murdered anyone on basis of their skin color. You are far off the cliff, you should atleast read about lenin and read more about communism in general.