this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
93 points (100.0% liked)

History Memes

1132 readers
714 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism (including tankies/red fash), atrocity denial or apologia, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Piefed.social rules.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

OTHER COMMS IN THE HISTORYVERSE:

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think it actually depends on what you're into or studying.

I like architecture and infrastructure so I tend to count from when infrastructure spread stops in an area especially with Rome (the empire, not the state) since their power receded in stages regionally.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

But don't you see different dates for different regions? And also changes in roman architectural styles itself?

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

If you look at architecture you do though, expensive materials receded more towards seats of per regionally, projects abandoned so on and so forth.

Not necessarily the style but how they're actually built, materials and such. Solid wall v. with junk infill, things where it starts with a more expensive or materially intensive techniques into ones where it's cheaper.

Also pottery is a pretty good indicator of how people are living at the time and a lot ends up inside or below construction as it is built.