this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
788 points (95.5% liked)

Political Memes

9922 readers
2017 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com -1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (7 children)

Why would some random post be the spec? Rewriting :::spoiler to ::: spoiler doesn't seem to make a difference.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (6 children)

Are you... serious? It's not, it's just a reporting of it, If you would prefer this version of the same information, here you go. Go nuts, it's all the same thing. Why are you so hung up on this? Was your whole message really so meaningless to you that you're willing to abandon it in favor of being sidetracked about this formal grammar bs?

(rewriting ::: spoiler does make a difference to those of us with less user-proof clients, thank you for that!)

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com -2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (5 children)

You seem hung up: as stated earlier, this renders correctly in standard web browser & clients following standards. If that markdown should work, then accommodating broken clients doesn't help pressure fixing them.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Yea but I already clarified that my confusion was with the contents, not the format. I don't understand what your goal in sending it is because the message is unclear (though I do also appreciate that you've edited it).

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

It's abundantly clear when rendered correctly: posting an image of text without text alternative results in a multitude of issues we don't get by simply linking to the source.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Again, the rendering issues were not my problem; I can read markdown well enough that it's not a true barrier to communication. The issue is that it is by no means clear what your point is. Even knowing that's what your message was, it's difficult to gain that information from the text of what you said. It's poorly structured and lacks a clear thesis. There's grammatical errors that make it almost impossible to parse. Some of the points seem totally random to include. Etc.

It's also just... not how a realistic idea of how a meme community works. Seldom do people have the original post to link back to, and posting purely in text is somewhat antithetical to the whole concept (if that was your suggestion, I'm still uncertain about that. What is "text alternative"?).

I really think that if this is important to you, you should go back and heavily rework your template so that it's clear to the reader what you mean.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Seldom do people have the original post to link back to

I don't think so: people just seem to take gratuitous screenshots for no great reason when linking or embedding web content has been around for ages. It's a waste. I'm pretty sure they don't realize the consequences unless pointed out.

The summary needs text alternative should be clear enough.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

That you misunderstood when I was quoting you should really be a sign here: I meant what is a text alternative; as in, can you give a more complete example of a text alternative. Just linking back to the source, especially ones that may not still exist like older screengrabs of twitter, is not a complete solution.

Also you seem to think OCR is for some reason a bad solution when afaik its never even been tried broadly on lemmy, and you dismiss both OCR and manual transcription as "bullshit" when both solutions enable all of the accessibility features you're (I think?) requesting (and they're also extremely commonly used by members of several-if-not-all of the groups you're speaking for). The assumption that everyone here is posting OC is also demonstrably just not the case, there's hundreds of hits for this screenshot alone that have the exact same size, ratio and cropping going back years.

Seriously your heart seems to be in the right place, but maybe you're a bit blind to the idea that some of the realities you're basing this on don't entirely reflect the one we all live in?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)