this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
1027 points (97.9% liked)

memes

18231 readers
2707 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you definition hasn't evolved since the 50s it might be a little out of date. That definition could draw retirement at this point.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you definition hasn’t evolved since the 50s

How do you read English?

[–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not the same as old or middle English I'll tell you that. I also don't speak Latin or Germanic despite those being the origin of many of the words I use.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Not the same as old or middle English I’ll tell you that.

Did you drop a decimal point? Middle English isn't 50 years old. Hell, the Transatlantic Accent isn't 50 years old.

I also don’t speak Latin or Germanic

You'll never make it as a proper Catholic.

[–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Are you trying to argue that language is static? Because we both know that's bullshit. Especially when it comes to slang. At this point I don't know what you're trying to argue. It seems like you're trying to derail the conversation instead of defending your position.

We're also talking about 70 years ago. It's hard to remember that the 90s weren't 10 years ago, but let's stay on topic.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you trying to argue that language is static?

I'm pointing out a term's historical roots. You just seem to be arguing through hyperbole. FFS, even if you don't want to acknowledge the existence of Latin, you might at least recognize the existence of etymology as a field.

We’re also talking about 70 years ago.

Brother, wait till you find out how old Arabic numerals are.

[–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Not for the last 3 replies you haven't. If that's your only point then we aren't in disagreement. You and I both know where the term originated. It seems like you're fighting the idea that it could change since then. If that's the case I'll reiterate, language changes. Slang changes faster than most.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If that’s the case I’ll reiterate

You would have to make sense the first time for it to matter

[–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Now I'm pretty sure you're just talking in circles. Go enjoy your day because this conversation has ended.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Go enjoy your day

Hey! That's the spirit. Touch some grass, bro.