this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
1785 points (99.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

9751 readers
1417 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] plyth@feddit.org 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Under actual socialism, the state owns the means of production. There is no private sector to tax. There is no flow of revenue from independent businesses because those businesses no longer exist as independent entities. Your points about taxation, profit collection, and philanthropy only make sense inside a mixed economy, precisely the system you claim to be replacing.

That's your explanation. I quoted Wikipedia showing that there can be a flow of revenue. So why can't socialism work like single payer healthcare?

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

That was in response to your statement.

You claimed there was no private business involved, and I already addressed that. You’ve now quoted the very text I used in rebuttal.

Once again: what you’re describing is social democracy, not socialism. Universal healthcare does not require socialism to exist.

Take countries like Canada, France, or even Cuba, which is a socialist country. Their universal healthcare systems rely on taxing businesses to fund them.

The private sector supplies the healthcare infrastructure, and the government subsidizes that care for the population.

I encourage you to look up what a subsidy is, how taxation works, and how economies function across different forms of government. You lack the fundamental understanding needed to have a meaningful discussion about these topics, let alone form an informed opinion.

So far, you have not acknowledged anything I’ve stated. You still do not understand what socialism is, you do not grasp its definition, and you do not understand what you are advocating for.