this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
17 points (94.7% liked)
NZ Politics
797 readers
2 users here now
Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!
This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi
This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick
Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Charter schools are different from the boot camps, right? My understanding is a charter school is a public school that is run by a company. They don't have to follow the curriculum (I think?) so you'll see schools focused around problem students, under achievers, or neurodiverse students.
Personally I don't like them and think we should support these students directly rather than via some company, but I think it's wrong to equate them to the boot camps.
All boot camps are charter schools but not all charter schools are boot camps.
I think we shouldn't rule out some charter schools helping just because boot camps don't. Having dedicated support for certain students may well be beneficial. The real question is why do we pay companies loads of money to do this instead of providing that money to the existing schools.
Not sure where you’re at but in general charter schools pick and choose only the students they want and let the public schools deal with the more difficult
In New Zealand, I know some apps don't show the community display name but this is the NZ Politics community.
This is the government's description of charter schools, specifically calling them public schools: https://www.charterschools.govt.nz/what-is-a-charter-school/
As mentioned above, some charter schools are boot camps intended to deal with the more difficult students (but with evidence they don't work). There are also specialist schools such as the new ones for autistic/neurodivergent students (jury still out on if they will help).