this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
829 points (96.3% liked)
memes
19044 readers
1469 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Is this the only argument?
Because while that's dangerous, modern safety standards in vehicles mean the probability of mortality in these situations is substantially reduced.
My point is that people won't die, not that it's a good thing to do.
People die from being rear-ended or rear-ending someone all the time though
It happens, yes.
Just like people dying in T-bone or head-on collisions. Not to mention rollovers and other crashes.
Each of them carries the chance of fatality.
It's unpredictable, which is why we can't eliminate fatalities entirely.
My most recent point is that even the fatalities from being rear-ended are significantly reduced from even 10-15 years ago. Making the small (but still too high) probability of a fatality from that type of crash, smaller (but still too high).
Therefore, the most likely outcome from such an incident would be the destruction of property, not loss of life.
Which is the original point I was being pedantic about. The original comment was that stopping and not driving wouldn't kill anyone, and the reply that kicked off this insane tangent, was that the people behind might.
And I'm staying, no, they won't die (it is statistically very unlikely).
Edit to include original context:
But it's rear-ending either way though, when you think about it lok
There would still be less dead people.
How
I'm not doing this again.
I don't get it