this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
158 points (98.8% liked)

news

24462 readers
765 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body.

If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include not just the twitter.com URL but also Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source (archive.today, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org). Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed.

Mass-tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken Markov chain bot will result in a comm ban.

Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.

Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned.

Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ukraine/talks-could-have-ended-war-ukraine | Archived

At the first meeting, the Russians presented a set of harsh conditions, effectively demanding Ukraine’s capitulation. This was a nonstarter. But as Moscow’s position on the battlefield continued to deteriorate, its positions at the negotiating table became less demanding. So on March 3 and March 7, the parties held a second and third round of talks [...]

https://sputnikglobe.com/20240428/ukraine-rejected-2022-peace-deal-over-russian-language-status--banning-nazism-terms---welt-1118153431.html

Regarding territorial issues, parts of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions of Donbass would remain under Russian control

Moscow ostensibly wanted Kiev to slash the size of its army to 85,000 people, while Ukraine insisted on retaining a strength of 250,000.

Edit: Replaced "reporter" with "politician" in the post title

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today -4 points 17 hours ago (30 children)

There are a lot of national socialist apeing as "leftist" who are working with Russia to undermine European democracies.

Even if you believe Russias position as an antagonist towards NATO is overall good on a geopolitical scale in regards to multipolarism. It doesn't mean they as a country arent extremely conservative in a cultural sense and nationalist in a political sense. Or that they aren't supporting far right politicians all over the world as it benefits them in the long run.

[–] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 27 points 16 hours ago (11 children)

lol. Should've known the dastardly Russians were behind everything all along.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 0 points 13 hours ago (10 children)

I mean they would be stupid not to support radical parties in their oppositional democracies. It just speed runs democracies natural tendencies to decay into fascism.

[–] Johnny_Arson@hexbear.net 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

So you've now moved the goal post from supporting far right parties to "radical" parties. Interesting.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The far right isnt a radical party?

[–] Johnny_Arson@hexbear.net 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

No because western Europe and Amerikkka are fascist as fuck. Radical would be outside the norm. But please accuse me of pedantry again.

countdown

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Are you claiming that all "democratic" nations are inherently fascist nations at any point of their economic/political development?

[–] Johnny_Arson@hexbear.net 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Did I say all? No I was pretty specific.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

And what differentiates a fascist western "democracy" from a non fascist democracy.

[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Dictatorship of a different class? This is fundamental Marxist theory, states are a dictatorship of one of several classes. You can't have democracy for the proletariat (vast majority of people) in a state that is a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie (small, powerful minority). Note: "dictatorship" of a class means that a state is organized to advance the interests of that class, not "dictatorship" as in "opposite to democracy" or "governed by one person".

Therefore, even in principle liberal "democracies" cannot be democratic. It's not a decay of democracy, it's an impossibility for it to have ever existed in those cases.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)