this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
354 points (97.6% liked)

World News

50964 readers
2079 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

New Zealand has announced plans to eradicate feral cats by 2050, as part of efforts to protect the country’s biodiversity.

Speaking to Radio New Zealand on Thursday, conservation minister Tama Potaka said that feral cats are “stone cold killers” and would be added to the country’s Predator Free 2050 list, which aims to eradicate those animals that have a negative impact on species such as birds, bats, lizards and insects.

Cats had previously been excluded from the list, which includes species such as stoats, ferrets, weasels, rats and possums, but Potaka used the interview to announce a U-turn.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I wouldn't bother. If they're this simple and loud about whatever they think they comprehend of evolution and natural selection concepts, you know them and their cat are ironically nature's food in the first 48 hours detached from society's teet. Lucky for them, we keep getting better at keeping the weakest around. Mike Judge does a good film about it.

[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm sorry that your love of cute, cuddly animals has allowed you to suspend your belief in basic science. I'd hoped you were made of sterner stuff. Perhaps on your next interaction, you could dispense with the backhanded insults and argue the actual point?

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Show us how the strongest and fittest do it with that esteemed advantage of "basic science".

Fuck the ecoologists. We await you and your cat's venture into the realm of 5d natural selection chess. May all living things not deemed cute and cuddly disappear so the strongest and fittest live on, unhindered forever more.

And you have had two scientific studies presented to you at this point, so, we're sorry we failed in presenting arguments. Backhanded comments is all we have left now. It's what plants need.

[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

Basic science. Numbers above 1 are more than 1. This is supposed to be your thing, oh grand fittest one.