askchapo

23218 readers

113 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

Posts must ask a question.
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net

replaceable@hexbear.net

VILenin@hexbear.net

SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net

khizuo@hexbear.net

Wakmrow@hexbear.net

Are humans (theoretically) at the point of post-scarcity? (hexbear.net)

submitted 2 months ago by CleverOleg@hexbear.net to c/askchapo@hexbear.net

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Meaning, are we as a species at a point of technological development where if we have a global revolution tomorrow, and make it our top priority as a species, we could provide every human with:

‘ -sufficient nutritious food to eat and water to drink

‘ -comfortable housing with a reasonable about of space for everyone

‘ -electricity and sewers

‘ -productive employment

‘ -quality heathcare

‘ -education

‘ -a modest amount of the “stuff” we all like: books, TV shows, live music, coffee, etc etc

And being able to do this in a way that is environmentally sustainable and at least arrests further erosion of the climate and natural environment.

When I look out at our productive capabilities as they stand now, my gut says this is possible but I really don’t know.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] 9to5@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago

couldnt you give incentives to those that do jobs that suck like access to more energy ? (just for example) I havent thought this through. just a thought.