this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
736 points (98.8% liked)

People Twitter

9450 readers
1015 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 29 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Isn't it the same problem tho, since they can make the sheets smaller and say there's more without actually offering a longer roll?

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We need legally defined toilet paper roll standards.

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lets setup some ISO standards for shit wipers.

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

I would be shocked if there isn't already one. The trick is getting companies to adhere to it.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Helps that they tend to be square-ish, there's a subsection of people who would notice immediately if you can't fold perfect paper cranes from a single sheet while you're pooping.

[–] Lojcs@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago

pretty sure they are rectangles

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

Oh, totally. It's by no means a good measurement, it's just the only one that's in some way tied to anything tangible. "8=39" doesn't mean anything.

[–] Fermion@mander.xyz 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Which matters more total kg or mm^2^ ?

[–] huppakee@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Kg for sure, i wouldn't trust tp with a low cost per mm²

[–] Fermion@mander.xyz 2 points 2 months ago

I also don't trust a toilet paper with a low gsm.

Maybe we need both a gsm and total weight labeling.