this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2025
150 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
742 readers
375 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If she said any of this in a slightly different way it would be indistinguishable from a bloodthirsty maniac. She says:
Media was better when it was purely American and controlled by two or three corporations. People seeing the opinions and media of foreigners is bad
Video footage of genocide can be explained away using tables and statistics. Children seeing actual photographic evidence of genocide should be easily persuaded into believing the opposite of their lying eyes through curated graphs
The holocaust is not an event that can be compared to other instances of racism and genocide. In particular, it can not be used to discuss similar treatment of black people by white people, and it certainly cannot be used to discuss the current state of Palestinians.
This is just an outright evil person, right?
I'd say that what she is saying already sounds like stuff a bloodthirsty maniac would say.
So yes, she is an outright evil person.
I'm starting to think the parts of the Holocaust where gay people, catholics, Roma people, communists etc were killed didn't bother her using this logic.
In many cases, westerners think that those people weren't genocided (only Jews were) and if they do think it happened, they deserved it because communists and Roma are bad in their eyes.