this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2025
-19 points (29.8% liked)

Showerthoughts

38849 readers
921 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

AI (LLMs and image generators, really) is trained on human-made material scraped from the entire internet. As more and more communities and sites online are filled with AI-generated content, AI training is in danger of getting stuck in a loop, trained on its own output again and again.

Communities that are harshly purist in their anti-AI rules are thus an excellent source of curated training data for AI while the rest of the internet becomes unusable for the task.

Perhaps AI companies and their products are even deliberately so annoying, shitty and repulsive, because they want to spark some resistance, have a part of the population reject AI and enforce anti-AI rules and communities.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vatlark@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Rule 2 is a little gray but if the title reads like a catchy headline, then it's probably not a complete thought. Another way to think about it, the title should make you want to read more because it's a good thought, not because it a cliff hanger.

OP, would you mind updating the title with a little more context?

For example if you added "because they are providing training data" to the title. It would seem more like a complete thought to me.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Changed it, a bit long now but I guess it's ok?

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Nope. Entire thought needs to be in headline