this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2025
29 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23183 readers
468 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
replaceable@hexbear.net
VILenin@hexbear.net
SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net
khizuo@hexbear.net
Wakmrow@hexbear.net
29
What are the moral arguments against nuclear energy? (hexbear.net)
submitted 4 weeks ago by Salah@hexbear.net to c/askchapo@hexbear.net
28 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Climate activists are usually very against nuclear energy and I don’t think I understand why. Does anyone know?

Arguments I’m somewhat familiar with:

  • sometimes it’s used as a cover for developing nuclear weapons
  • nuclear waste is very bad for living things.

What are the main historical moral arguments?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 1 points 4 weeks ago

There's at least one. In Finland.

Ninja edit. Haha. I thought they finally finished it. Nope. "Will be" - it's still under contruction.

The Onkalo spent nuclear fuel repository is a deep geological repository for the final disposal of spent nuclear fuel.[1][2] It is near the Olkiluoto Nuclear Power Plant in the municipality of Eurajoki, on the west coast of Finland. It will be the world's first long-term disposal facility for spent nuclear fuel

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onkalo_spent_nuclear_fuel_repository

There was a documentary about it that came out in 2010.

Danish director Michael Madsen has co-written and directed a feature-length documentary Into Eternity (2010) where the initial phase of the excavation is featured and experts interviewed. The director's special emphasis is on the semiotic difficulties in meaningfully marking the depository as dangerous for people in the distant future.