this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2025
269 points (99.3% liked)

Privacy

43169 readers
487 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/52889139

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ijon_the_human@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The European Court of Human Rights has next to nothing to do with the EU.

It is an international organization operating under The Council of Europe, which again, has little to do with the EU.

The Council of Europe predates the EU and is closer to the UN in its manner of operation. It does not make binding laws.

It has 46 member states (the EU has 27) including countries such as Albania, Armenia, Turkey, and Ukraine. Russia was expelled in 2022.

What can be confusing however is that The Council of Europe uses the same flag as the EU.

[–] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

True, but the EU member states are members of it, and while complicated, ECHR rulings are generally respected by members and the EU. Why make things simple, right? :-)

[–] ijon_the_human@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Again, they they are completely different organizations. It's not a question of simplicity or complexity.

The ECHR looks to address human rights issues with the cooperation of its 46 member states.

The EU is (mostly) a trade union comprising of 27 member states.

The UN, NATO, and WTO also have many European member states and again are different organizations.

[–] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago

You made your point, and it was clearly understood the first time. Perhaps you don't understand my point?