this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
179 points (99.4% liked)
Privacy
5478 readers
32 users here now
Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.
Rules
PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!
- Be civil and no prejudice
- Don't promote big-tech software
- No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
- No reposting of news that was already posted
- No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
- No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)
Related communities:
Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.
- !opensource@programming.dev
- !selfhosting@slrpnk.net / !selfhosted@lemmy.world
- !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !drm@lemmy.dbzer0.com
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
… comrade, everything in the EU is public. Capitalists in parliament are capitalists, their lobby is public:
You are their slave, they are your Masters.
You do not deserve privacy, they do.
No, I was referring to the HLG that helped draft this legislation. We know who in the EU sent out the invitations, but requests to find out who was in the grouo were denied.
https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/networks/high-level-group-hlg-access-data-effective-law-enforcement_en
This is still (afaik) not public information.
Did you follow the links on the PDFs? Their names & draft sites are all cited throughout the citations.
e.g. Written submission: EDRi
You're citing from a document criticizing the HLG. These are sources for that criticism.
These are not members of the HLG itself.