politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Is that why people are actually mad though? Because of the privilege that isnt being extended to other prisoners or because they want this person to suffer. I think it's quite clear that they do perceive the injustice here being that she has a dog, not that other prisoners don't have dogs.
She didn’t give a flying fuck if children suffered, so why are we giving her puppies? She deserves to be rewarded for her atrocities?? What the fuck is wrong with you? Are you a pedophile looking for sympathy’s?? Should we also reward puppies and lollipops to the IDF soldiers raping prisoners with knives??
Because we're not like her. Being cruel accomplishes nothing. Her punishment is being segregated from society. That is enough, anything else is vindictive.
I think this topic might be triggering you, maybe filter out the names of the people mentioned in the title so you don't have to see this in future.
Rewarding bad behavior enables bad behavior. I don’t reward pedophiles. Period.
Prison isn't a reward. Her quality of life is objectively worse now. It isn't enabling, it's the total opposite. Confinement to a place damage can no longer be done
Puppies are rewards. Moving to nicer prisons with cushier settings like foreign language and gardening classes are rewards. Getting pardoned for keeping other pedophiles safe is a reward.
Get fucked.
Their not rewards because she isn't getting those things because she's a pedophile, she's getting them because she's rich and well connected. That's the injustice here. Pedophiles aren't motivated to commit pedophilia because they'll get a dog I'm prison. It being a reward for pedophilia is such a poorly thought through take.
Nowhere did I say she is getting those things because she is a pedophile. However, she IS getting those things regardless of her being in prison for being a pedophile.
Crimes are more likely to be commit when there are no consequences for committing those crimes.
The issue you and I have is that you think pedophiles should still have access to cushy things, and I don’t. They stripped the humanity of the most vulnerable and harmed their life, and in this particular case not just once but more cases than we even know the full extent of, while also helping to keep the crimes going just so she can get an easier ride from her own consequences.