this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
192 points (98.0% liked)

politics

29166 readers
3443 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Representative Ro Khanna, a prominent progressive and potential 2028 candidate, explicitly called for Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer to resign in the latest episode of Right Now. Khanna says that Schumer is ultimately responsible for Senate Democrats cutting a deal with Republicans that will likely end without enhanced subsidies for Obamacare being put back in place. He called the agreement a “moral surrender.” If it was never possible for Democrats to win those subsidies, they shouldn’t have been the basis for the shutdown strategy, Khanna argued. The California congressman said it was particularly disheartening to see this deal less than a week after Democrats had resounding wins in elections across the country. He floated Senator Chris Van Hollen as a possible replacement for Schumer.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Triumph@fedia.io 30 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I'm okay with MTG turning on Trump, and I'm okay with Khanna calling out Schumer.

Fuck it, let them eat each other.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I agree I'm fine with letting them rip each other to shreds, but knowing MGT and Kahnna (and Massie) are backed by Peter Thiel, let's me know that he is likely paying them (and the press) to do this for a reason. It may sound like too much of a conspiracy theory to believe, but there's a documented history of certain government agencies in the U.S. using media to manipulate broad public opinion, so at the very least you should be a little curious about who is pulling your strings and why. Because it's never being done strictly for your benefit.

I think everyone knows Trump could be replaced by Vance at any point over the next 3 years without anyone really giving it much thought.

Who would replace Schumer isn't as clear, but again, when you consider which Democrat is lobbying for his replacement (not AOC, not Sanders, but this fucking slimeball) you should question why his funder would need to oust Schumer right now?

As much as I dislike Schumer, he and other senators and members of the House are calling for the investigation of Peter Thiel and JP Morgan.

This is just a guess, but the first name that Kahnna floated for Schumer's replacement, is also currently investigating Thiel's crypto ties. Maybe Thiel's hoping that he would be willing to look the other way if Thiel helped him advance his career?

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 4 points 4 months ago

Same page overall.

It may sound like too much of a conspiracy theory to believe, ...

I find myself surprised about what notions I'm no longer willing to write off out of hand.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Yes. But we have to just keep this information too And not forget it.