There's no evidence at all that the Putin regmine is even slightly moved by casualty numbers. Indeed - their losses may well be part of the plan - an expected and accepted trade-off. It's not stated enough how internal ethnic cleansing of trading useless mouths for prime ukrainain lands and population is a perfectly logical conclusion. If you're a completely depraved petromafia gangster ghoul...numbers mean nothing unless you're talking about money and sq. km of stolen land. The numbers shock some people, but pretending the Kremlin cares is like throwing ice cubes at the sun.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'd like to add: Almost all Russians think the same as Putin regarding what is a number of casualties that will be too much. To the question "what is a number of casualities that makes you think the war is a bad thing instead something that hurts but will bring glory?", their answer is: "There is no such number. Our leader will [read: should] only stop once we reach victory!"

But, they do care about a certain other thing: a number of casualties exists that will be too much for people to want to let their children be forced to the front.

They will not stop supporting the war no matter what the casualties, but they will stop going to the front once the casualities have reached their target number. And that will of course end the war.

Also, there's another relevant number: How many percents of your salary is bread allowed to cost before you start opposing the war. This has to do with the death toll, because the more deaths, the more salary must paid to each soldier, and the more the other industries have to increase their salaries in order to remain in competition for the workforce.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

No matter what anyone claims, almost everyone is against war once it truly touches them, war is awful.