this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2025
153 points (99.4% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8607 readers
429 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Authorities are considering whether to charge an Indiana homeowner who they say shot and killed a woman working as a house cleaner after she mistakenly went to the wrong address.

Police officers found 32-year-old Maria Florinda Rios Perez dead just before 7 a.m. Wednesday on the front porch of the home in Whitestown, an Indianapolis suburb of about 10,000 people, according to a police news release. She was part of a cleaning crew that had gone to the wrong address, the release said.

Rios Perez’s husband, Mauricio Velazquez, told WRTV in Indianapolis that he and his wife had been cleaning homes for seven months. Velazquez said he was standing with her at the home’s front door on Wednesday morning but didn’t realize she had been shot until she fell into his arms, bleeding.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Here in KC, the old motherfucker who shot Ralph Yarl died awaiting trial. I hope the husband gets justice, but I doubt he will. Guns are a religion here in America from top to bottom, and no one stops to consider that you could use your fucking words before pulling that trigger.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

30+ states seem to have made it legal to not have to ask questions (maybe that's going further than what the article said, which just said they have similar castle doctrine-like laws). Not saying that's a good thing, but it appears that's what some are prepared for.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

Castle doctrine. Even the name is medieval.

[–] crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Doesn't castle doctrine only apply to inside the house, anyway? Idk, IANAL

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It says something about gaining unlawful entry... But I'm no expert.

Some laws back in the day, at least in the US, had it extend to wherever your body was, essentially in an effort to not have to flee or retreat from a threat, as that was seen as un-American. Just a brief snippet of what I read on Wikipedia about the matter.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Those are the "Stand Your Ground" laws. Basically means you don't have an obligation to retreat.

Depends on what state you are in.