I'm looking to something Astronomy/space/astrophysics to listen to while I work that isn't Techbro Elon slop, AI voice, or clickbaity
EDIT: Thank you thank you thank you these are all great I'm so excited for space facts
this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2025
31 points (100.0% liked)
askchapo
23167 readers
226 users here now
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
-
Posts must ask a question.
-
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
-
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
-
Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
His recent episode where he fully endorses Richard Dawkin's theory that evolutionary selection acts causally on strictly a genetic level was disappointing in how underinformed / disinterested in alternatives it was.
At least they had the discretion to leave out the hack theory of memetics that Dawkin's was pushing.
Memetics as initially laid out by Dawkins seemed fine? The idea of viewing ideas as discrete bits of information transmitted from person to person and subject to mutation seems fine? Like it's not really a falsifiable claim or one that is subject to an internal mechanism that can be mapped out (What is the DNA code equivalent in a meme?) and I don't think it's supposed to be or have that.
I'm not in the social sciences though.
Isn't Dawkins biggest achievement being a racist and inadvertently coining the term meme? I genuinely don't know tbh because I remember reading somewhere (when I used to read) his actual meme theory was completely disproven.
It isn't disproven because it isn't falsifiable. It doesn't rise to the level of scientific theory, it's a framework to understand cultural ideas through a biological lense. It's basically "Check out this cool idea I had" level of rigor. There was a brief attempt to turn Memetics into a serious area of study but that died out.
Dawkin's biggest achievement was writing The Selfish Gene, which presented an extremely good (Or at least extremely widely accepted) argument for a gene based view of evolution, which has basically become the assumed standard for most introductory biology at this point. There are many arguments against it that have been presented since, and gene centered evolution becomes less and less the standard the further your education goes, but it is what it is.
Thanks for explaining