498
Tech CEOs suggest AI job losses could be offset by UBI which they will violently oppose
(www.thebeaverton.com)
For posting satire from The Onion and other similar sources.
redundancy, but not for its own sake
Be nice. All instance rules apply.
Rules:
- Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- No Ads / Spamming.
- No pornography.
Règles :
- Soyez respectueux. Tout le monde doit se sentir le bienvenu ici.
- Pas de bigoterie - y compris le racisme, le sexisme, le capacitisme, l’homophobie, la transphobie ou la xénophobie.
- Pas de publicités / Pas de spam.
- Pas de pornographie.
In actual non-ironic news, UBI is not just the best but the only plausible remedy for AI job losses that I have ever heard of. It's still not a great solution, though. A disturbingly small number of people are able to derive meaning from anything other than work.
And people without meaning get nasty.
Except there's one small problem: AI is nowhere near ready to replace humans at the scale tech CEOs claim it will or even does. All what CEOs did is to force smaller crew to work 72 hours a week, which sure will be very sustainable in the short run.
So make them pick up trash or something to get the check? Your argument sounds a lot like perfection getting in the way of progress.
"them", right.
Yes, the people without meaning. Your antecedent.