this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2025
70 points (98.6% liked)
El Chisme
515 readers
1 users here now
Place for posting about the dumb shit public figures say.
Rules:
Rule 1: The subject of a post must be a public person.
Rule 2: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 3: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 4: No sectarianism.
Rule 5: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 6: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 7: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 8: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If a post gets upvoted and used, people always get mad at removal. This is always the case for literally any post removal on the entire site. It's not limited to the dunk tank drama. It's not even a unique phenomenon to hexbear, it's how it goes with literally every content removal on reddit when something is placed in a sub with content rules if that content also got upvotes/comments, it always upsets the users if something that got upvoted gets removed.
That doesn't make the content rule bad. Just means mods didn't get there early enough to remove it before people would start upvoting and using it.
They're not mad about content enforcement or they'd be upset at the 0 comment threads being removed, what they're actually mad at is having their activity disrupted. That's not actually the rule, it's the existence of rules altogether.
You're really eliding the part where no consistent criteria for enforcement exist
Anyone who is a brand or working for one, or anyone who is part of a public-interest news event. Everyone else is not a public figure?
Million follower streamer: not a public figure.
Amazon delivery driver: working for a brand, public figure.
Streamers are all brands if they're making income from it. Some are shitty brands, they are brands nonetheless.
Is the amazon delivery driver using their position as a delivery driver to raise the platform that their voice stands on?
The reason a person working for a brand is mentioned here is because someone working at CNN who tweets something is using the fact they work for the CNN brand as a platform to stand upon to raise their voice above that of others. This makes them a public figure. The amazon driver is not gaining a platform from being an amazon driver, so they're not a public figure, except in the cases where they've been thrust into being a public figure through some news event, for example if an amazon driver is involved in a police shootout and was present at the scene.
As the One True Egoist of Hexbear and famous rule hater, I simply cannot remember having any moderation action taken against my posts due to rules. Complainers should simply post better. 💁
Yeah I think anyone that has moderated a space anywhere would realise this.
I really think that the people that are like that just need to be bullied a bit about it. Some moderation is good and needed. I think some of it is just general anti authority sentiment in the left and sometimes users in a leftist space allow their behaviour towards cops to leak into their behaviour towards moderators when that's an absolutely inappropriate way to react or behave. Not that mods aren't guilty of mistakes either at times though.