this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
117 points (97.6% liked)
Open Source
42167 readers
75 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I am interested in those people who are not trying to monitize everything. So that is a good filter for me.
On the other hand, there is no reason why they can't curate their own sponsorship, or even run their own ads. Seems like there is more money in that than trying to break big on you tube.
Yes, there are also creators which public their work without any financial interests, but the most which create contents with effort and quality, like cientific documentals, music and other artistic content have costs producing and publishing it. In Odysee they have an fair system to gain money, like also in Bandcamp, without nagging and annoying the user for it, like in YT. In PeerTube to do it the creators can only use third party services for it (Patreon or others), otherwise they can do only the same as YT, blocking the access to their instance as paid service.
That is pretty much zero no days though. The only real cost is time.
I mean yes, they will need a computer. They might need lighting if they are on camera, but from then on, zilch. You could do it with a cell phone for video.
I have a kid that published their music with videos, and there is no cost at all, using all the free tools available.