this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2025

191 points (100.0% liked)

science

22247 readers

326 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

m3t00@lemmy.world

Joleee@lemmy.world

laverabe@lemmy.world

DeadPand@midwest.social

laverabe@lemmy.zip

191

A Collaborative Site That Allows You to See the Scientific Consensus on a Question with Just One Click (papermap.org)

submitted 1 day ago by FactChecker@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] obsoleteacct@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Are the down votes because people genuinely think this is an incorrect answer, or because they dislike anything remotely pro-AI?

[–] CatsPajamas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Both probably. Thought terminating cliches and all that. The most useful tool maybe ever. Wild.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I use LLMs daily as a professional software engineer. I didn't downvote you and I'm not disengaging my thinking here. RAGs don't solve everything, and it's better not to sacrifice scientific credibility to the altar of convenience.

It's always been easier to lie quickly than to dig for the truth. AIs are not consistent, regardless of the additional appendages you give them. They have no internal consistency by their very nature.